Why saying "AI Ethics" is too broad (Response Optional but Encouraged)
Hey Delegates, Less than a week away until conference! We have loved grading your papers thus far (as much as anyone can love grading papers) and I think I've noticed how many of you reference AI ethics and AI ethical standards as a broader term. I wanna dive into why the term AI ethics is a little too broad and how you can narrow your scope for your solutions. Think about the general term of ethics to understand why this is important. We all know that it is important to be "ethical" and we might recognize when something is certifiably unethical (i.e. maybe I don't know the dictionary definition of ethics but I do know it is unethical to take a bribe). When we dive into AI ethics, the lines are a little blurred though because the international community hasn't come to a consensus yet on what those lines are. Some even ask if artificial intelligence can be ethical at any stage of implementation. Assuming you can use AI ethically, what could ethical usage constitu
